The Supreme Court’s decision today that electors must vote in accordance with the candidate who won the state sends a clear message ahead of the 2020 election. The court voted unanimously that electors “have no ground for reversing the vote of millions of its citizens’. Justice Elena Kagan wrote, “that direction accords with the Constitution, as well as with the trust of a Nation that here, We the People rule.”
While there has been a growing movement against the Electoral College, the decision made by all the justices is a setback for those who think the voting process in America is obsolete. In 2016, ten voters voted against the state. While it did not impact the election results, an increase in faithless electors could have potentially turned the system inside out. If the race came down to a few Electoral College votes, faithless electors could change the results of the election.
The case leaves in place voting laws in 32 states and DC that requires electors to vote in accordance with the popular vote. In 2016, Hillary Clinton electors in Washington and Colorado refused to vote for her, despite her winning the popular vote in the state. Their goal was to encourage Donald Trump electors in other states to break against the popular vote, and therefore, cost him the Electoral College victory. Bret Chiafalo was fined $1,000 because he voted for Colin Powell instead of Hillary Clinton. The federal appeals court in Denver sided with the petitioners, ruling that electors can vote their own choice rather than who won the popular vote in the state. The Supreme Court, however, made it clear the democratic process would follow the instructions from the Constitution, and made sure to make the decision to avoid election turmoil in November.
Why this matters: The Founding Fathers, when developing the governing structures, understood the importance of a fair and free election. After Hillary Clinton won the popular vote and lost the Electoral College vote, there has been a growing movement to abolish this part of the system. It was created, however, to ensure states with a larger population couldn’t throw off the balance and have a stronger impact than states with smaller populations. Furthermore, this particular case with the electors, is an attempt to impose one’s own political agenda over the will of the people in that state, collectively. It is a very important decision for upholding the country’s original democratic principles, and will help prevent future election drama.
Distinct suppliers sell the extracts in glass or bottles vials that fluctuate in the size and volume.
An average-sized bottle comes with a dropper on the lid and is made of around
15ml quantity. Even the dropper is not only appropriate and
accurate, but it is the very favorite way of quantifying
the dose of their effective extracts. Due to the potent nature of these extracts, so it is wise to start
with tiny dosages and gradually escalate it. For example, one particular gram (2 capsules) will
be a perfect dose for firsttime consumers of this gold capsule.
For liquid, one shed is the number for the beginners and some other individuals.
Users believe 2 drops of the liquid infusion to be a powerful dose.
OPMS golden has become the strain of Kratom.
Use of accurate dosage gives you the ability to take advantage of
the health and recreational benefits that the solution has to
offer. Don't forget to shop about and identify a trustworthy
dealer who sells the product at a neutral price.
That way, you will have a high likelihood to receiving the very best product.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/the_founders_outsmarted_the_presidential_election_fraudsters.html
Here is a good read on the Electoral college. They do not have to follow the popular vote. The Red State Legislatures do have to ratify the results of their electors. If the Red State Legislatures refuse to participate in the fraud it goes to the House to vote, one vote for each State, not a vote of the full house. There are 26 Red States, Trump should win.