Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, X , Youtube  

By: Brendi Wells

“Capital is not a thing, but a social relation between persons, established by the instrumentality of things.” – Karl Marx

At first glance, Capitalism and Communism appear to be opposites: the former celebrates individual ownership, while the latter promotes collective ownership. But when we peel back the layers, a striking similarity emerges. Both systems are, at their core, predicated on centralized control of resources and power. This centralization results in the exploitation of the masses for the benefit of a few elites, perpetuating cycles of inequality and stagnation.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!  

Crony Capitalism: The Mirage of a Free Market

In theory, Capitalism is a system of free enterprise where private individuals own property, make independent choices, and reap the rewards of their labor. But in practice, it often operates as a controlled economy dominated by cronyism and government intervention. Large corporations, ostensibly the epitome of free enterprise, are frequently propped up by government kickbacks, subsidies, and bailouts.

This creates an illusion of a free market while consolidating wealth and power into the hands of an “approved” elite. These individuals—CEOs, bankers, and corporate magnates—are allowed to thrive as long as they conform to the system. Should they challenge the status quo, they risk losing their wealth and influence.

The masses are given just enough wealth and opportunity to maintain the illusion of fairness. This trickle-down approach placates workers, keeping them invested in a system that is fundamentally rigged against them. Far from empowering individuals, Capitalism often traps them in cycles of wage dependency, where upward mobility is limited and true ownership is elusive.

Communism: Crony Capitalism’s Mirror Image

Communism claims to eliminate inequality by abolishing private ownership and redistributing wealth. But in practice, it centralizes control in the hands of a ruling elite who claim to act on behalf of the “commune.” The result is not collective empowerment but a different form of exploitation.

Instead of private corporations dominating the economy, a centralized bureaucracy—often referred to as the “Central Committee”—takes its place. The rhetoric of equality masks the reality: resources are hoarded by a few, and ordinary workers are left with little autonomy or reward for their labor.

In this sense, Communism is simply Capitalism taken to its logical extreme, where all property is consolidated into a single “company” owned by the state. Both systems prioritize control over empowerment, concentrating power in the hands of a few while marginalizing the many.

Two Sides, One Coin

Whether under Capitalism or Communism, the result is the same: centralized power, inequality, and exploitation. The difference lies only in the branding. Capitalism sells the illusion of individual freedom, while Communism promises collective liberation. Neither delivers.

As Marx himself warned:
“Accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutalization, and moral degradation at the opposite pole.”

Both systems rely on a fundamental deceit: that centralizing control, whether in private hands or a state apparatus, will lead to prosperity for all. Instead, they create cycles of dependency and disempowerment, ensuring that the ruling class—whether corporate or bureaucratic—remains in control.

The Free Market: A True Alternative

To break this cycle, we must reject the false dichotomy of Capitalism versus Communism and embrace a truly free market system. Unlike the manipulated markets of Capitalism or the command economies of Communism, a free market empowers individuals to own their labor, innovate, and reap the rewards of their efforts.

Here’s what a truly free market system might look like:

No Government Favoritism: In a free market, there are no subsidies, bailouts, or special treatment for corporations. Businesses succeed or fail based on their ability to create value, not their political connections.

Fair Competition: A small, effective state ensures fair competition by preventing monopolies and enforcing contracts. Beyond this, the government has no role in regulating commerce.

Dynamic Resource Allocation: Resources flow to those who demonstrate the ability to create value. Wealth is earned through productivity and innovation, not inherited privilege or government largesse.

Individual Empowerment: Property rights are tied to contribution, ensuring that individuals retain the fruits of their labor. Those who innovate and produce are rewarded, while those who hoard or exploit are held accountable.

End of Cronyism: Without government intervention, there is no room for cronyism or corporate favoritism. The market operates as a meritocracy, rewarding effort and ingenuity.

Breaking Free

As Marx observed, “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it.” It is time to change the systems that perpetuate inequality and exploitation.

The solution lies not in Capitalism or Communism but in a free market system that decentralizes power and rewards individual effort. By rejecting centralized control, we can create a system that empowers individuals to innovate, produce, and thrive—free from the chains of bureaucracy and cronyism.

A Call to Action

The conflict is not between Capitalism and Communism. It is between systems that centralize power and those that empower individuals. The future belongs to those who dare to innovate, create, and reclaim ownership of their labor and lives. Let us redefine the narrative and build a system that rewards hard work, initiative, and the true fruits of human creativity.