Everyone is being taken care of except the Christians in Lebanon. Same in Armenia. Same In Ukraine. Same in Romania.
Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, X , Youtube
An impactful Christian influencer in the Levant released a post on X this morning which outlines the Christian plight in the Middle East, enabled by Trump administration policy. The Christians are concerned with the lack of focus on their community by The White House and its envoys to the region.
Everyone is being taken care of except the Christians in Lebanon. Same in Armenia. Same In Ukraine. Same in Romania.
Why is that?
Enquiring minds want to know.
Lebanon at the Abyss: The Sunni-Turkish-Gulf Endgame and the Imperative of Immediate Partition
The strategic objective currently pursued by the Sunni-axis powers—Turkey, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, with the United States functioning as an occasionally reluctant enabler—is no longer the mere containment of Hezbollah or the cosmetic restoration of Lebanese sovereignty; it is the deliberate dissolution of the historic Lebanese entity into a de-facto Greater Sunni Syria, a contiguous belt of Sunni-dominated territory stretching from the Turkish border through Idlib, Aleppo, Homs, Tripoli, and Beirut all the way to the Palestinian camps of the south, thereby completing the demographic and political re-engineering begun by the 1989 Taef Agreement and accelerated by three decades of engineered migration and sectarian gerrymandering.
At the center of this design stands Tom Barrack, the Lebanese-American financier who, in his capacity as Donald Trump’s special envoy and personal friend, has repeatedly described Lebanon as “a failed state that never should have existed in its current form” and has privately advocated, according to multiple sources quoted in diplomatic leaks published in August and November 2025, a “soft merger” of Lebanon’s Sunni-majority areas with post-Assad Syria under a loose confederation overseen by Ankara and Doha—an arrangement that would leave the remaining Christian and Druze enclaves as isolated, powerless Bantustans surrounded by a Sunni sea, deprived of defensible borders, viable ports, or any meaningful international guarantee.
The instrument chosen to execute this dissolution is the same Taef Accord that Saudi Arabia imposed in 1989 through its minions Rafic Hariri and the Syrian occupation apparatus: a document that systematically stripped the Maronite presidency of executive authority, froze parliamentary representation on the basis of a long-obsolete 1932 census, legalized the naturalization of several hundred thousand predominantly Sunni Syrians and Palestinians in 1994, and created a governance system so paralyzed by sectarian vetoes that no major decision—from electricity provision to judicial appointments—can be taken without the consent of the very Saudi-aligned Sunni bloc that has used Taef for thirty-five years as both sword and shield to prevent any reform that might restore Christian political weight or halt the demographic hemorrhage.
Every promise currently being made by the Gulf emissaries—the billions for reconstruction, the rescue of the banking sector, the strengthening of the Lebanese Armed Forces, the expansion of the Abraham Accords—comes with the explicit, non-negotiable condition that the Taef architecture remain untouched, because Taef is the legal and constitutional cage that guarantees perpetual Sunni primacy even after Christians have been reduced to a dwindling minority; and once Hezbollah is dismantled, as it soon will be either by Israeli strikes or by enforced disarmament under American pressure, nothing will stand between the remaining non-Sunni communities and the quiet, Gulf-financed ethnic cleansing already visible in the accelerating Christian emigration rates and the systematic purchase of Mount Lebanon real estate by Qatari and Emirati shell companies.
Federalism, confederalism, or any other form of power-sharing within a single Lebanese state is therefore not a solution; it is a lethal illusion, because every federative formula presupposes the continued validity of Taef’s demographic distortions and sectarian quotas, which means that any future “Christian canton” or “Druze autonomy” would be gerrymandered into indefensible fragments, denied control over its own security forces, and subjected to economic strangulation by a Sunni-dominated central government bankrolled by Riyadh and Doha.
